The Pathologist
  • Explore Pathology

    Explore

    • Latest
    • Insights
    • Case Studies
    • Opinion & Personal Narratives
    • Research & Innovations
    • Product Profiles

    Featured Topics

    • Molecular Pathology
    • Infectious Disease
    • Digital Pathology

    Issues

    • Latest Issue
    • Archive
  • Subspecialties
    • Oncology
    • Histology
    • Cytology
    • Hematology
    • Endocrinology
    • Neurology
    • Microbiology & Immunology
    • Forensics
    • Pathologists' Assistants
  • Training & Education

    Career Development

    • Professional Development
    • Career Pathways
    • Workforce Trends

    Educational Resources

    • Guidelines & Recommendations
    • App Notes
    • eBooks

    Events

    • Webinars
    • Live Events
  • Events
    • Live Events
    • Webinars
  • Profiles & Community

    People & Profiles

    • Power List
    • Voices in the Community
    • Authors & Contributors
  • Multimedia
    • Video
    • Pathology Captures
Subscribe
Subscribe

False

The Pathologist / Issues / 2026 / August / Hidden Pitfalls in MET Exon 14 Testing
Biochemistry and molecular biology Genetics and epigenetics Liquid biopsy Molecular Pathology

Hidden Pitfalls in MET Exon 14 Testing

Large cohort study examines limitations of DNA- and RNA-based sequencing in routine diagnostics

08/17/2026 News 3 min read
  • Full Article
  • Summary
  • Takeaways
  • Scorecard
  • Quiz

Share

Objective:

To evaluate current testing approaches for detecting MET exon 14 skipping variants in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and identify limitations in diagnostic accuracy.

Approach:
  • Study Design: Analysis of 379 NSCLC samples collected between 2016 and 2024 to identify MET exon 14 and splice-site variants.
  • Testing Methods: Comparison of DNA- and RNA-based next-generation sequencing (NGS) for confirming exon 14 skipping.
  • Quality Assessment: Examination of the first multinational external quality assessment (EQA) programs for MET exon 14 testing.
Key Findings:
  • 171 distinct MET exon 14 and splice-site variants were identified.
  • RNA testing confirmed exon 14 skipping in 107 out of 114 variants assessed.
  • Two large deletions were missed by DNA-based testing but visible in raw data.
  • 57 variants could not be evaluated due to insufficient tissue or RNA quality.
  • Tissue-based testing had a 98% success rate in EQA, while liquid biopsy testing improved from 38% to 63% pass rates from 2022 to 2024.
Interpretation:

The study highlights the challenges in detecting MET exon 14 alterations.

Limitations:
  • Insufficient tissue or inadequate RNA quality limited the evaluation of some variants.
  • False-negative results were common in liquid biopsy testing, particularly for low allele fractions.
Conclusion:

Combining DNA- and RNA-based testing may reduce missed clinically relevant variants.

Sources:
  • The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics

This content is an AI-generated, fully rewritten summary based on a published scholarly article. It does not reproduce the original text and is not a substitute for the original publication. Readers are encouraged to consult the source for full context, data, and methodology.

Newsletters

Receive the latest pathologist news, personalities, education, and career development – weekly to your inbox.

Newsletter Signup Image

Explore More in Pathology

Dive deeper into the world of pathology. Explore the latest articles, case studies, expert insights, and groundbreaking research.

False

Advertisement

Recommended

False

Related Content

Breathing New Life into Diagnostics
Genetics and epigenetics
Breathing New Life into Diagnostics

January 22, 2024

6 min read

Jonathan Edgeworth on how metagenomics could transform testing for respiratory infections

Molecular Spectacular
Genetics and epigenetics
Molecular Spectacular

January 8, 2024

1 min read

A look at last year’s most interesting molecular pathology stories

Redefining Diagnostic Reference Standards
Genetics and epigenetics
Redefining Diagnostic Reference Standards

January 3, 2022

1 min read

Find out what Horizon Discovery’s diagnostic reference standards can do for your workflow

Defining the Next Generation of NGS
Genetics and epigenetics
Defining the Next Generation of NGS

December 31, 2021

1 min read

Overcoming challenges of the typical NGS workflow with the Ion Torrent™ Genexus™ System

Affiliations:

Specialties:

Areas of Expertise:

Contributions:

False

The Pathologist
Subscribe

About

  • About Us
  • Work at Conexiant Europe
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Advertise With Us
  • Contact Us

Copyright © 2026 Texere Publishing Limited (trading as Conexiant), with registered number 08113419 whose registered office is at Booths No. 1, Booths Park, Chelford Road, Knutsford, England, WA16 8GS.