The Pathologist
  • Explore Pathology

    Explore

    • Latest
    • Insights
    • Case Studies
    • Opinion & Personal Narratives
    • Research & Innovations
    • Product Profiles

    Featured Topics

    • Molecular Pathology
    • Infectious Disease
    • Digital Pathology

    Issues

    • Latest Issue
    • Archive
  • Subspecialties
    • Oncology
    • Histology
    • Cytology
    • Hematology
    • Endocrinology
    • Neurology
    • Microbiology & Immunology
    • Forensics
    • Pathologists' Assistants
  • Training & Education

    Career Development

    • Professional Development
    • Career Pathways
    • Workforce Trends

    Educational Resources

    • Guidelines & Recommendations
    • App Notes
    • eBooks

    Events

    • Webinars
    • Live Events
  • Events
    • Live Events
    • Webinars
  • Profiles & Community

    People & Profiles

    • Power List
    • Voices in the Community
    • Authors & Contributors
  • Multimedia
    • Video
    • Pathology Captures
Subscribe
Subscribe

False

The Pathologist / Issues / 2026 / August / Hidden Pitfalls in MET Exon 14 Testing
Biochemistry and molecular biology Genetics and epigenetics Liquid biopsy Molecular Pathology

Hidden Pitfalls in MET Exon 14 Testing

Large cohort study examines limitations of DNA- and RNA-based sequencing in routine diagnostics

08/17/2026 News 3 min read
  • Full Article
  • Summary
  • Takeaways
  • Scorecard
  • Quiz

Share

Clinical Scorecard: Hidden Pitfalls in MET Exon 14 Testing

At a Glance

CategoryDetail
ConditionNon-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)
Key MechanismsDetection of MET exon 14 skipping variants as predictive biomarkers for targeted therapy
Target PopulationPatients with NSCLC
Care SettingMolecular testing laboratories

Key Highlights

  • MET exon 14 skipping alterations occur in approximately 3–4% of NSCLCs.
  • Tissue testing shows high performance; liquid biopsy accuracy is lower.
  • RNA testing confirmed exon 14 skipping in 107 out of 114 variants assessed.
  • Two large deletions were missed by DNA-based testing but visible in raw data.
  • Pass rates for liquid biopsy testing improved from 38% in 2022 to 63% in 2024.

Guideline-Based Recommendations

Diagnosis

  • Assay validation should include large deletions, synonymous splice-site variants, and intronic changes.

Management

  • Combine DNA- and RNA-based testing when sufficient material is available.

Monitoring & Follow-up

  • Participate in external quality assessment programs to improve testing performance.

Risks

  • False-negative results are common in liquid biopsy testing, especially for low allele fractions.

Patient & Prescribing Data

Patients with NSCLC undergoing molecular testing for MET exon 14 alterations.

MET exon 14 skipping variants are established predictive biomarkers for targeted therapy.

Clinical Best Practices

  • Optimize liquid biopsy assays to improve detection rates.
  • Validate bioinformatics pipelines alongside laboratory workflows.

Related Resources & Content

  • The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics

This content is an AI-generated, fully rewritten summary based on a published scholarly article. It does not reproduce the original text and is not a substitute for the original publication. Readers are encouraged to consult the source for full context, data, and methodology.

Newsletters

Receive the latest pathologist news, personalities, education, and career development – weekly to your inbox.

Newsletter Signup Image

Explore More in Pathology

Dive deeper into the world of pathology. Explore the latest articles, case studies, expert insights, and groundbreaking research.

False

Advertisement

Recommended

False

Related Content

Breathing New Life into Diagnostics
Genetics and epigenetics
Breathing New Life into Diagnostics

January 22, 2024

6 min read

Jonathan Edgeworth on how metagenomics could transform testing for respiratory infections

Molecular Spectacular
Genetics and epigenetics
Molecular Spectacular

January 8, 2024

1 min read

A look at last year’s most interesting molecular pathology stories

Redefining Diagnostic Reference Standards
Genetics and epigenetics
Redefining Diagnostic Reference Standards

January 3, 2022

1 min read

Find out what Horizon Discovery’s diagnostic reference standards can do for your workflow

Defining the Next Generation of NGS
Genetics and epigenetics
Defining the Next Generation of NGS

December 31, 2021

1 min read

Overcoming challenges of the typical NGS workflow with the Ion Torrent™ Genexus™ System

Affiliations:

Specialties:

Areas of Expertise:

Contributions:

False

The Pathologist
Subscribe

About

  • About Us
  • Work at Conexiant Europe
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Advertise With Us
  • Contact Us

Copyright © 2026 Texere Publishing Limited (trading as Conexiant), with registered number 08113419 whose registered office is at Booths No. 1, Booths Park, Chelford Road, Knutsford, England, WA16 8GS.