A recent article in The Pathologisttraced pathology's remarkable journey – from postmortem observation to molecular precision, from the microscope to AI-assisted diagnostics. It's a compelling arc. But there's a chapter still being written that deserves a place in this story: that in which the pathologist steps out from behind the slide to sit across the table from the patient.
I know this chapter personally. A few years ago, my pathologist, Jeff Myers, sat down with me and walked me through my own digitized pathology slide in plain language. I saw how the actual tissue correlated with the findings, explained by the person who had studied them most closely. It reframed everything I thought I understood about my diagnosis. It also raised an obvious question: why doesn't this happen more often?
I later discovered that it has been happening for years at a few institutions willing to rethink what a pathologist's role can look like. Mayo Clinics in Rochester and Florida, Duke Health, Tufts Medical, Endeavor Health, Michigan Medicine, and others, have quietly built pathology explanation clinics into their care models. They are led by brave, forward-thinking pathologists who recognized the value of this work long before it had a name – and their patients have benefited enormously. So, notably, have the institutions. And so have the pathologists.
What makes this development significant isn't just that it's novel. Patient clinics directly address several historical pressure points raised in the aforementioned article:
Empowering patients directly. For most patients, a pathology report is the single most consequential document in their care, and the one they're least equipped to read. Hearing findings explained in plain language, directly from the physician who examined the tissue, reduces fear and confusion, restores a sense of agency, and gives patients the confidence to ask better questions and take an active role in their own treatment decisions.
Redefining the pathologist's role. For over a century, pathologists have been described as "the doctor's doctor" – essential, but invisible to the patient. Explanation clinics put pathologists into direct clinical relationships with the people whose care depends on their work, elevating the specialty's visibility and reframing pathologists as treating clinicians in their own right, not just a name on a report.
Reducing the burden on ordering physicians. Oncologists, surgeons, and primary care physicians are often left to translate dense, technical pathology language under significant time pressure. When a pathologist can explain the findings directly, it frees up that appointment time for treatment planning rather than report interpretation.
Keeping patients in the loop. Patients who don't understand their diagnosis are more likely to misunderstand their treatment plan, delay decisions, or fall out of care entirely. A pathologist walking a patient through the actual evidence – the slide, stains, and findings – builds the kind of clarity and trust that keeps patients engaged in the plan that was designed for them.
Reinforcing value. Programs like these strengthen patient satisfaction and loyalty, differentiate the institutions that offer them, and give pathologists a renewed, tangible sense of purpose – seeing the human outcome of diagnostic work that too often remains invisible to the very patients it serves. That's a meaningful counterweight to burnout, not another driver of it.
The article closed by inviting laboratory professionals to share how their work has shaped pathology's evolution. Mine is this: pathology's next chapter may not be written primarily in a lab or on a slide scanner. It may be written across a table, in plain language, with a patient who finally understands their own diagnosis – because the person who found it took the time to explain it to them.
