The climate in medical education is evolving – and, with it, the responsibilities of the educators are expanding. To keep pace, modern medical educators must continually adapt their teaching methods while remaining at the forefront of medical knowledge and pedagogy.
This presents challenges: increased workloads, administrative responsibilities, and emotional commitment to understanding the evolving demands of student-centered pedagogy. In my experience, burnout amongst medical educators is rife.
In recent years, many medical schools have introduced undergraduate medical education wellbeing programs to support the mental health of their students. Such initiatives offer structured support and assistance for the multiple stressors that accompany medical training. As such, they play a crucial role in helping students manage the heavy workloads, emotional charges, and constant performance pressures that are part of their training and success.
While these efforts are both noteworthy and necessary, one essential question remains: Is the wellbeing of medical educators who dedicate themselves to training future healthcare providers receiving the same level of attention?
Here, I examine some of the challenges for educators and explore the cultural shifts that might be needed in order to avoid endemic burnout.
Exhausting demands, complex requirements
Why is teaching medicine now so much more complex than in the past?
Modern teaching approaches might include competency- and case-based learning, clinical reasoning, and group discussions. All these require instructors to continually improve and adapt their strategies to facilitate student engagement and mastery of the material. Add to this the integration of technology-enhanced learning tools, simulation-based training, and interprofessional education, and you end up with yet more layers of complexity, requiring ongoing professional development and adaptability from educators.
Beyond teaching and mentoring, medical educators are often expected to have clinical duties, conduct research, and secure funding – expectations that create considerable pressure and intense workloads and present considerable challenges in balancing priorities. Additionally, faculty in medical education have significant administrative responsibilities that are critical for maintaining high standards and meeting accreditation requirements.
Medical educators are often viewed as the most suitable faculty members to engage in education-related institutional functions. Their responsibilities include ensuring compliance with national and institutional standards as well as actively participating in curriculum development, reform, and quality improvement efforts.
All these pressures can quickly lead to overwhelm and exhaustion.
Breaking point
Medical educator exhaustion presents in various ways – emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, a diminished sense of personal accomplishment… Faculty members who are women or belong to racial and ethnic groups underrepresented in medicine typically experience higher rates of burnout and attrition than their counterparts. That might be due to additional pressures faced in their social environment; however, research into the factors driving these disparities is still developing.
These signs of stress affect not only the educators' physical and mental wellbeing, but may also have significant implications for the quality of education they can provide. Ultimately, their stress impacts the training of the next generation of healthcare professionals.
Of course, faculty across all the different academic disciplines are susceptible to work-related exhaustion. However, what sets medical educators apart is the drastic evolution of their role compared to when they were students themselves.
As healthcare evolves in response to societal changes, medical curricula are continually reassessed and restructured, while new scientific knowledge is continuously added to the teaching content. Medical educators not only have to assimilate new content, but also adopt novel teaching methods that differ significantly from those they previously experienced.
So what needs to change?
A cultural shift
A multi-layered approach – that combines interventions with long-term strategies – is required to address medical educators’ work-related stress. Ideally this would include institutional support, personal well-being initiatives, and cultural shifts within academia. First and foremost, professional development opportunities to enhance knowledge and boost confidence in their discipline field should be offered as standard. Workshops on time management and stress reduction can also help educators be better teachers.
Faculty retreats focused on resilience-building strategies might support long-term faculty wellbeing. Formal mentorship programs can offer educators the guidance and support they need to navigate the complexities of their roles. Wellness programs that include mental health resources and protected time for research and professional development should also be considered by medical schools.
A flexible system of workload distribution that balances teaching with other responsibilities is urgently required. Faculty rotation models – where educators can shift between administrative and teaching-intensive roles – can prevent chronic stress and exhaustion.
While current accreditation standards recognize the importance of faculty wellbeing, the implementation of comprehensive and targeted support mechanisms remains inconsistent. Future strategies should prioritize faculty wellness using innovative technological tools, strategic workload management, and specialized support programs tailored to the unique challenges faced by educators.
By fostering a culture of support and recognition, institutions can ensure that medical educators in both the preclinical and clinical settings remain engaged, motivated, and capable of training the next generation of healthcare professionals effectively.
Newsletters
Receive the latest pathology news, personalities, education, and career development – weekly to your inbox.
