Conexiant
Login
  • The Analytical Scientist
  • The Cannabis Scientist
  • The Medicine Maker
  • The Ophthalmologist
  • The Pathologist
  • The Traditional Scientist
The Pathologist
  • Explore Pathology

    Explore

    • Latest
    • Insights
    • Case Studies
    • Opinion & Personal Narratives
    • Research & Innovations
    • Product Profiles

    Featured Topics

    • Molecular Pathology
    • Infectious Disease
    • Digital Pathology

    Issues

    • Latest Issue
    • Archive
  • Subspecialties
    • Oncology
    • Histology
    • Cytology
    • Hematology
    • Endocrinology
    • Neurology
    • Microbiology & Immunology
    • Forensics
    • Pathologists' Assistants
  • Training & Education

    Career Development

    • Professional Development
    • Career Pathways
    • Workforce Trends

    Educational Resources

    • Guidelines & Recommendations
    • App Notes

    Events

    • Webinars
    • Live Events
  • Events
    • Live Events
    • Webinars
  • Profiles & Community

    People & Profiles

    • Power List
    • Voices in the Community
    • Authors & Contributors
  • Multimedia
    • Video
    • Podcasts
Subscribe
Subscribe

False

The Pathologist / Issues / 2015 / Aug / Squishy Science
Oncology Oncology Laboratory management

Squishy Science

By Roisin McGuigan 08/25/2015 1 min read

Share

Could a tumor “squishiness” detector open a new avenue of cancer research?

The exciting field of molecular diagnostics is yielding some game-changing discoveries in oncology, providing hope for early intervention and increased survival rates. But are molecular and genetic biomarker assays truly the best approach for monitoring cancer progression? Conventional wisdom says yes, but innovation rarely follows convention. Results emerging from the NIH’s Physical Science Oncology Centers (PSOC) are showing the possibility of a new class of biomarkers based not on a tumor’s chemical properties, but on its physical properties. However, unlike with chemical biomarker assays that can be performed in a high throughput manner, screening for hundreds or even thousands of biomarkers at once, performing these mechanical measurements is a painstakingly slow process. “Oncologists and physicians might view this as a barrier, but as engineers, we saw it as an exciting challenge,” says Andrea Armani, part of the team who decided to tackle the problem.

“Dr. David Agus of the University of Southern California’s Keck Medical School was intrigued by recent studies which showed tumors to have very different Young’s moduli (YM) as compared with healthy tissue. But he was frustrated at the complex and slow methods used to measure this value, so he tasked my group with finding a simple and quick method to perform this measurement”, recalls Armani. The Young’s modulus describes the amount of force needed to compress a sample, and is a measurement of elasticity (or “squishiness”). Instruments to measure YM already exist, but are cumbersome, sensitive to environmental vibrations, and require recalibration by a trained user when moved. Armani and her colleagues solved the problem with optical fiber: the sample is compressed on top of an optical fiber, which changes the polarization of the light inside, allowing the YM to be calculated (1). The new instrument is the size of a back pack, easy to use, and is fully portable. “It is important to recognize that the fundamental field of correlating mechanical markers (such as elasticity) to cancer prognosis is relatively new. Our method could prove to be extremely useful in these studies – and because it is non-destructive, samples can be subsequently tested using molecular or cellular methods, such as genomic profiling,” says Armani. While initial results have shown that more aggressive tumors seem to be stiffer, more research is needed. “This advancement from Dr. Armani is so exciting, as we now have a new dimension of tumor to measure,” adds David Agus.

Newsletters

Receive the latest pathology news, personalities, education, and career development – weekly to your inbox.

Newsletter Signup Image

References

  1. M Harrison, AM Armani, “Portable polarimetric fiber stress sensor system for visco-elastic and biomimetic material analysis”, Appl Phys Lett, 106, 191105 (2015).

About the Author(s)

Roisin McGuigan

I have an extensive academic background in the life sciences, having studied forensic biology and human medical genetics in my time at Strathclyde and Glasgow Universities. My research, data presentation and bioinformatics skills plus my ‘wet lab’ experience have been a superb grounding for my role as an Associate Editor at Texere Publishing. The job allows me to utilize my hard-learned academic skills and experience in my current position within an exciting and contemporary publishing company.

More Articles by Roisin McGuigan

Explore More in Pathology

Dive deeper into the world of pathology. Explore the latest articles, case studies, expert insights, and groundbreaking research.

False

Advertisement

Recommended

False

False

The Pathologist
Subscribe

About

  • About Us
  • Work at Conexiant Europe
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Advertise With Us
  • Contact Us

Copyright © 2025 Texere Publishing Limited (trading as Conexiant), with registered number 08113419 whose registered office is at Booths No. 1, Booths Park, Chelford Road, Knutsford, England, WA16 8GS.